IT
has been my intention, for several years past, to publish my thoughts upon
religion; I am well aware of the difficulties that attend the subject, and from
that consideration, had reserved it to a more advanced period of life. I
intended it to be the last offering I should make to my fellow-citizens of all
nations, and that at a time when the purity of the motive that induced me to it
could not admit of a question, even by those who might disapprove the work.
The
circumstance that has now taken place in France, of the total abolition of the
whole national order of priesthood, and of everything appertaining to
compulsive systems of religion, and compulsive articles of faith, has not only
precipitated my intention, but rendered a work of this kind exceedingly
necessary, lest, in the general wreck of superstition, of false systems of
government, and false theology, we lose sight of morality, of humanity, and of
the theology that is true.
As
several of my colleagues, and others of my fellow-citizens of France, have
given me the example of making their voluntary and individual profession of
faith, I also will make mine; and I do this with all that sincerity and
frankness with which the mind of man communicates with itself.
I
believe in one God, and no more; and I hope for happiness beyond this life.
I
believe the equality of man, and I believe that religious duties consist in
doing justice, loving mercy, and endeavoring to make our fellow-creatures happy.
But,
lest it should be supposed that I believe many other things in addition to
these, I shall, in the progress of this work, declare the things I do not
believe, and my reasons for not believing them.
I
do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman
church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church,
nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church.
All
national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish,
appear to me no other than human inventions set up to terrify and enslave
mankind, and monopolize power and profit.
I
do not mean by this declaration to condemn those who believe otherwise; they
have the same right to their belief as I have to mine. But it is necessary to
the happiness of man, that he be mentally faithful to himself. Infidelity does
not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to
believe what he does not believe.
It
is impossible to calculate the moral mischief, if I may so express it, that
mental lying has produced in society. When a man has so far corrupted and
prostituted the chastity of his mind, as to subscribe his professional belief
to things he does not believe, he has prepared himself for the commission of
every other crime. He takes up the trade of a priest for the sake of gain, and,
in order to qualify himself for that trade, he begins with a perjury. Can we
conceive anything more destructive to morality than this?
Soon
after I had published the pamphlet COMMON SENSE, in America, I saw the
exceeding probability that a revolution in the system of government would be
followed by a revolution in the system of religion. The adulterous connection
of church and state, wherever it had taken place, whether Jewish, Christian, or
Turkish, had so effectually prohibited, by pains and penalties, every
discussion upon established creeds, and upon first principles of religion, that
until the system of government should be changed, those subjects could not be
brought fairly and openly before the world; but that whenever this should be
done, a revolution in the system of religion would follow. Human inventions and
priest-craft would be detected; and man would return to the pure, unmixed, and
unadulterated belief of one God, and no more.
AGE of REASON: CHAPTER
II - OF MISSIONS AND REVELATIONS.
EVERY national church or religion has
established itself by pretending some special mission from God, communicated to
certain individuals. The Jews have their Moses; the Christians their Jesus Christ,
their apostles and saints; and the Turks their Mahomet; as if the way to God
was not open to every man alike.
Each of those churches shows certain books,
which they call revelation, or the Word of God. The Jews say that their Word of
God was given by God to Moses face to face; the Christians say, that their Word
of God came by divine inspiration; and the Turks say, that their Word of God
(the Koran) was brought by an angel from heaven. Each of those churches accuses
the other of unbelief; and, for my own part, I disbelieve them all.
As it is necessary to affix right ideas to
words, I will, before I proceed further into the subject, offer some
observations on the word 'revelation.' Revelation when applied to religion,
means something communicated immediately from God to man.
No one will deny or dispute the power of the
Almighty to make such a communication if he pleases. But admitting, for the
sake of a case, that something has been revealed to a certain person, and not
revealed to any other person, it is revelation to that person only. When he
tells it to a second person, a second to a third, a third to a fourth, and so
on, it ceases to be a revelation to all those persons. It is revelation to the
first person only, and hearsay to every other, and, consequently, they are not
obliged to believe it.
It is a contradiction in terms and ideas to
call anything a revelation that comes to us at second hand, either verbally or
in writing. Revelation is necessarily limited to the first communication. After
this, it is only an account of something which that person says was a
revelation made to him; and though he may find himself obliged to believe it,
it cannot be incumbent on me to believe it in the same manner, for it was not a
revelation made to me, and I have only his word for it that it was made to him.
When Moses told the children of Israel that
he received the two tables of the commandments from the hand of God, they were
not obliged to believe him, because they had no other authority for it than his
telling them so; and I have no other authority for it than some historian
telling me so, the commandments carrying no internal evidence of divinity with
them. They contain some good moral precepts such as any man qualified to be a
lawgiver or a legislator could produce himself, without having recourse to
supernatural intervention
When I am told that the Koran was written in
Heaven, and brought to Mahomet by an angel, the account comes to near the same
kind of hearsay evidence and second hand authority as the former. I did not see
the angel myself, and therefore I have a right not to believe it.
When also I am told that a woman, called the
Virgin Mary, said, or gave out, that she was with child without any
cohabitation with a man, and that her betrothed husband, Joseph, said that an
angel told him so, I have a right to believe them or not: such a circumstance
required a much stronger evidence than their bare word for it: but we have not
even this; for neither Joseph nor Mary wrote any such matter themselves. It is
only reported by others that they said so. It is hearsay upon hearsay, and I do
not chose to rest my belief upon such evidence.